PCH

PCH

Introducing personalization to help ensure retention of
new and recurring users for the new Publisher’s Clearing House digital eco-system.

Introducing personalization to help ensure retention of new and recurring users for the new Publisher’s Clearing House digital eco-system.

Role:

Director of Product Design

Contributions:

Team Management — UX Strategy — User Experience —
Design Leadership — Product Design

Team Management — UX Strategy — User Experience — Design Leadership — Product Design

Team Management — UX Strategy — User Experience — Design Leadership — Product Design

Core team:

Davidson Adames - Product Design Lead

Aldo Santa Ines - Director of User Research

Quinn Tully Doyle - UX Designer

Lead Copy Writer

Client

background

Publisher’s Clearing House has long been renowned for its sweepstakes, offering chances to win substantial cash prizes. Yet, Publisher’s Clearing House has more to discover and offer beyond cash giveaways.


Publisher’s Clearing House has long been renowned for its sweepstakes, offering chances to win substantial cash prizes. Yet, Publisher’s Clearing House has more to discover and offer beyond cash giveaways.

Challenge
& solution

Even though new users signed up for a Publisher’s Clearing House account, the business had difficulty getting users back onto the classic experience after their initial prize entry.

In order to prevent the same fate from happening with the new PCH experience, we created a strategy that caters to users interests, ultimately making the new PCH a place that users want to frequent often. By doing this, NXP (as it was coined internally) beat out the classic experience by 68% of its daily visits being recurring users.

The results:

The results:

The results:

68%

68%

Increase in monthly traffic,
beating out the classic experience.

5+

5+

Minutes average session time (an increase of 358%).

460%

460%

Increase in sweepstakes entry.

90k

90k

Prize entries within the
first month of the new PCH experience.

How we did it:

How we did it:

We first took to asking the existing users (old and new) of the Classic PCH experience some questions regarding the prizes that they saw online after their first prize entry. We saw some trends around the responses we got from the users that chose to participate in our survey.

“Same prizes over and over”

“Same prizes over and over”

“Nothing else interested me”

“Nothing else interested me”

“Didn’t see anything I liked”

“Didn’t see anything I liked”

“Most of the prizes feel dated”

“Most of the prizes feel dated”

While we were running the survey, I spearheaded an initial phase of research, consisting of an extensive comparative and competitive analysis to understand the retention methodologies of companies that PCH considers direct and indirect competitors.

While we were running the survey,
I spearheaded a an initial phase of research that consisted of an extensive comparative and competitive analysis to understand the retention methodologies of companies that PCH considers as direct and indirect competitors.

While we were running the survey, I spearheaded a
an initial phase of research that consisted of an extensive comparative and competitive analysis
to understand the retention methodologies of companies that PCH considers as direct and indirect competitors.

Based off of the feedback and various insights that were gathered. The team reached the consensus that Personalization - as a pillar - of the users experience would be vital to having users stay longer and return more frequently.

Based off of the feedback and various insights that were gathered.
The team reached the consensus that Personalization - as a pillar - of the users experience would be vital to having users stay longer and return
more frequently.

Personalization - One of the ingredients to success.

Personalization - One of the ingredients to success.

Knowing that Personalization was one of the main pillars the team wanted to implement into the NXP experience. I took on the responsibility of developing a strategy and vision with some questions leading the thought process, one of them being; how might we best serve our users content that interests them the most?


I designed a comprehensive user flow that allowed the whole team to see the “full picture”, this flow included Personalization as one of the main pillars in our strategy. With this flow, I worked closely with the product manager to create a detailed roadmap for the MVP that ultimately helped to envision and execute the best way to personalize the experience for users.

As part of the vision, I created a user interest survey flow that allowed users to choose their interests, in a fun, playful, and enticing way...or so I thought.

As part of the vision, I created a user interest survey flow that allowed users to choose their interests, in a fun, playful, and enticing way...or so I thought.

As part of the vision, I created a user interest survey flow that allowed users to choose their interests,
in a fun, playful, and enticing way...or so I thought.

What was learned from the first round of user testing the new user interest survey flow:

  1. Language was not educational enough for users to be enticed to take survey.

  2. Users felt limited and confused about how many interests they were allowed to choose.

  3. CTA language was too generic, users became confused and were worried about how to proceed in survey.

  4. While going through prototype, 43% of users didn’t intuitively know how to return to main interests list,
    after initial interest selection.

  1. Language was not educational enough for users to be enticed to take survey.

  2. Users felt limited and confused about how many interests they were allowed to choose.

  3. CTA language was too generic, users became confused and were worried about how to proceed in survey.

  4. While going through prototype, 43% of users didn’t intuitively know how to return to main interests list, after initial interest selection.

  1. Language was not educational enough for users to be enticed to take survey.

  2. Users felt limited and confused about how many interests they were allowed to choose.

  3. CTA language was too generic, users became confused and were worried about how to proceed in survey.

  4. While going through prototype, 43% of users didn’t intuitively know how to return to main interests list, after initial interest selection.

After a couple of iterations, we achieved success.

In collaboration with a User Experience Researcher (UXR) and a Lead Copywriter, we embarked on a journey to experiment with diverse tones of voice. This exploration involved testing various content delivery methods and call to action strategies. Our objective was to strike the perfect balance of enticing users and aligning their actions to our intent.

I also made sure to evolve the UI to be more intuitive for users by including directional iconography and altering the micro interactions of the survey.

With these updates, 87% of users that tested out latest prototypes were intrigued enough to take the user interest survey, of those users, 94% were able to successfully complete the survey.

With users willing to tell us more about themselves, the business was able to see what types of prizes, games and additional content users might want to see on the new experience in the future.

Making that
beautiful connection.

Making that
beautiful connection.

The next step to ensure that the strategy remained on track was to utilize our partner’s service. The new PCH experience was built on Adobe’s Experience Manager, which gave the team access to the Adobe Target personalization engine. Utilizing Target, we crafted our page layouts and components using a rule-based system that reflects user preferences identified during the onboarding process. This approach allows for the dynamic population of prizes and content tailored to those initial user choices and engagements. Furthermore, the more the user engaged with the new experience, the more the content evolved to align with the user’s ongoing interactions.

The next step to ensure that the strategy remained on track was to utilize our partner’s service. The new PCH experience was built on Adobe’s Experience Manager, which gave the team access to the Adobe Target personalization engine. Utilizing Target, we crafted our page layouts and components using a rule-based system that reflects user preferences identified during the onboarding process.

This approach allows for the dynamic population of prizes and content tailored to those initial user choices and engagements. Furthermore, the more the user engaged with the new experience, the more the content evolved to align with the user’s ongoing interactions.

The next step to ensure that the strategy remained on track was to utilize our partner’s service. The new PCH experience was built on Adobe’s Experience Manager, which gave the team access to the Adobe Target personalization engine. Utilizing Target, we crafted our page layouts and components using a rule-based system that reflects user preferences identified during the onboarding process.

This approach allows for the dynamic population of prizes and content tailored to those initial user choices and engagements. Furthermore, the more the user engaged with the new experience, the more the content evolved to align with the user’s ongoing interactions.

Example: Homepage instances

Example:
Homepage instances

Recurring user

New user (just registered)

Additional results:

40%

40%

More accounts created than the PCH Classic experience.

45%

45%

Decrease of Cost Per Acquisition (down to $2.70 from $6.00).

67%

67%

Of CRM emails were opened and engaged with.

Personalizing the user experience proved to have significant added benefits. It guided the product design team in prioritizing information architecture, tactics, and functionality. Additionally, it facilitated more effective collaboration with the Product Management, Content, and Contest teams.

Personalizing the user experience proved to have significant added benefits. It guided the product design team in prioritizing information architecture, tactics, and functionality. Additionally, it facilitated more effective collaboration with the Product Management, Content, and Contest teams.

Want to
work together?

I’m available to consult, freelance and even open to new full-time opportunities. If you think we can partner up and create something great, shoot me an email.

Contact me

© 2025 Christian Castellanos

© 2025 Christian Castellanos

© 2025 Christian Castellanos

© 2025 Christian Castellanos

© 2025 Christian Castellanos